By Treated Like a Daughter-in-Law: RCB Star Yash Dayal’s Legal Battle Over Exploitation Allegations
In a developing case that has sent shockwaves through both the cricketing and legal communities, Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) fast bowler Yash Dayal has approached the Allahabad High Court seeking a stay on his arrest. This move follows a First Information Report (FIR) registered against him by the Ghaziabad Police for allegedly mentally and physically exploiting a woman under the pretext of marriage. The cricketer, known for his promising performances in the Indian Premier League (IPL), now finds himself at the center of a serious legal and social controversy.
Royal-Challengers-Bengaluru-fast-bowler-Yash-Dayal-has-approached-the-Allahabad-High-Court-seeking-a-stay-on-his-arrest.
The Allegations
According to reports by The Indian Express and NDTV, a woman who had been in a five-year-long relationship with Yash Dayal filed a complaint accusing him of exploitation on multiple levels — emotional, physical, and financial. The charges were registered under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which pertains to sexual intercourse by deceitful means, including through a false promise of marriage.
Yash-Dayal-filed-a-complaint-accusing-him-of-exploitation-on-multiple-levels-emotional-physical-and-financial-The-charges-were-registered-under-Section-69-of-the-Bharatiya-Nyaya-Sanhita-(BNS)
The woman alleged that she was misled into believing she would eventually marry Dayal. She claimed that he introduced her to his family, who treated her like a daughter-in-law, thereby reinforcing the legitimacy of their relationship. The complainant stated that the cricketer behaved like a husband throughout their association, deepening her trust in him.
However, things reportedly changed when she confronted him about the status and future of their relationship. According to her statement, upon realizing that she had been misled, she protested — which allegedly resulted in physical violence and continued mental harassment. She also accused Dayal of exploiting her financially and emotionally during the course of their relationship.
Adding further complexity to the case, the woman claimed to possess substantial evidence, including screenshots of conversations, video call recordings, and photographs to support her claims. She also said that Dayal had engaged in similar relationships with other women, indicating a pattern of behavior rather than an isolated incident.
Yash Dayal’s Defense
In response, Yash Dayal filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court, seeking legal protection and a stay on his arrest. The petition, as quoted by The Indian Express, strongly denies all accusations of physical involvement or any relationship founded on false promises.
In-response-Yash-Dayal-filed-a-writen-petition-in-the-Allahabad-High-Court-seeking-legal-protection-and-a-stay-on-his-arrest
The cricketer’s legal team argued that the relationship was mutual and consensual, and not one initiated or maintained under the pretext of marriage. The petition emphasized that the woman had been treated like a daughter-in-law by Dayal’s parents, which, according to the defense, suggests genuine intent rather than deceit.
“…as per the FIR, it has been admitted by the informant that she was treated like a daughter-in-law by the parents of the petitioner, meaning thereby that the intention of the petitioner was never to cheat her…,” the petition reads.
Furthermore, the cricketer’s side insisted that the relationship deteriorated due to the complainant’s own behavior over time. The petition claims that Dayal realized he would not be able to marry her and chose to end the relationship, an act that, by itself, does not equate to making a false promise.
“It was a mutual friendship, which later on turned sour because of the victim herself,” Dayal stated in the petition.
The defense also challenged the legal merit of the complaint, arguing that even if the woman’s version of the events were accepted as true, it would only amount to a failure to fulfill a promise — not a false promise from the beginning, which is a key distinction under Section 69 of BNS.
Legal and Social Implications
This case is not just about one cricketer or one woman; it opens the floor for critical conversations around consent, deception, emotional abuse, and the use of criminal law in relationships that go sour.
Section 69 of the BNS (formerly a similar provision under Section 376 of IPC) was introduced to protect women from being lured into sexual relationships through false promises of marriage. However, such laws are increasingly facing scrutiny, particularly when relationships are consensual and long-term, and when the promise of marriage remains unfulfilled for various complex reasons.
The key legal question the court will need to address is whether Yash Dayal truly misled the complainant with a deceptive promise of marriage, or whether the relationship was one of mutual understanding that ended due to incompatibility or other personal factors.
Additionally, the mention of alleged similar behavior with other women, if substantiated, could strengthen the complainant’s case by showing a pattern. On the other hand, if proven untrue or exaggerated, it could work in Dayal’s favor by exposing possible inconsistencies in the narrative.
Public Reaction and Media Coverage
Being a public figure and an active member of the Royal Challengers Bengaluru, Dayal’s involvement in such a case has inevitably drawn significant media attention. Social media is awash with opinions, ranging from support for the complainant to skepticism about her motives, and vice versa.
Being-a-public-figure-and-an-active-member-of-the-Royal-Challengers-Bengaluru-Dayal’s-involvement-in-such-a-case-has-inevitably-drawn-significant-media-attention
Critics of the complaint argue that long-term consensual relationships can’t be treated as criminal simply because they end in disappointment. Supporters of the complainant, however, emphasize the need to hold public figures accountable for their actions, especially when there is a perceived misuse of power and trust.
The case has triggered a fresh debate about how relationships — especially those involving public personalities — are perceived in courts of law versus in the court of public opinion.
The Role of the Authorities
The Chief Minister’s grievance portal has taken cognizance of the complaint and has reportedly forwarded the matter to the concerned police station and superintendent for appropriate investigation. This intervention suggests that the matter is being treated with seriousness at the administrative level.
The-Chief-Minister’s-grievance-portal-has-taken-cognizance-of-the-complaint-and-has-reportedly-forwarded-the-matter-to-the-concerned-police-station-and-superintendent-for-appropriate-investigation
As the case moves forward, both parties will have an opportunity to present their side of the story, and the court will eventually decide based on the available evidence.
Looking Ahead
For Yash Dayal, this controversy comes at a crucial point in his career. After his breakout performances in the IPL, the 26-year-old had been viewed as a potential asset for Indian cricket’s future, particularly in white-ball formats. How this case impacts his career trajectory remains to be seen, but it’s safe to assume that the ongoing legal troubles will cast a long shadow over his professional endeavors for the foreseeable future.
As for the complainant, her courage to speak out — regardless of the outcome — highlights the importance of accountability in intimate relationships, especially when emotional and financial investments are involved.
Ultimately, this case will be a litmus test not just for the individuals involved, but for how Indian law interprets modern relationships, consent, and personal accountability. It underscores the thin line between betrayal and criminal misconduct, and the heavy responsibility that lies on courts to distinguish between the two.
Conclusion
The allegations against Yash Dayal and his subsequent legal response reflect the increasingly complex intersection of personal relationships, celebrity status, and the legal system. As the Allahabad High Court deliberates on the merits of the case, one can only hope that justice — uninfluenced by fame, media pressure, or emotional sentiment — will prevail. Whether Dayal is vindicated or held accountable, the case is a stark reminder of the legal and moral responsibilities individuals bear, both inside and outside the spotlight.
Click here to watch more!
Comments